FOR THE MASTER

On Michael Heiser’s Unseen Realm and Divine Council theory.

<p>Have you ever compared Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9? You should. You should also know how to deal with these two verses. It’s not a minor thing. In fact, I have heard pastors and teachers say that this issue is often too controversial to even bring up to their people for fear that people cannot [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Last week, I posted this graphic and asked a simple question: “Is there a KJVO who will defend this graphic by Jack McElroy using Biblical Hebrew and in light of the other creatures that are described in Job? It is arguments like this graphic that helped me see that KJVO is an emperor that has [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Since the start of the Israel-Iran conflict that began on June 13 as Israel launched a preemptive strike on dozens of sites in Iran including nuclear facilities, a heavy water nuclear reactor, top Iranian nuclear scientists, and top brass in the IRGC or Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; there has been nonstop discussion about the modern [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Today, I want to talk about dealing with negative criticism, slander, and personal attacks as a believer. This is not an issue that is limited to people in ministry or controversial pot-stirring pastors on YouTube and social media. Many of us deal with attacks from outside and even inside our own camps. Let&#8217;s talk about [&hellip;]</p>

<p>There is a Massive Inconsistency Problem among KJV Only Independent Fundamental Baptists (IFB). The IFB often prides itself on being separatists. They are separatists to the point that nothing is adiaphora. There don&#8217;t seem to be any secondary issues. There are no doctrines or issues where there isn&#8217;t a hard line of separation. In the [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Dan McClellan &nbsp;@maklelan&nbsp; says, &#8220;The Bible has been changed and that&#8217;s just not up for serious debate.&#8221; This claim is patently false. In this video, Dan McClellan is going to empty red Herrings, appeal to authority, and false dilemma as he speaks of technicalities and misrepresents or conflates facts. That’s a strong accusation on my [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Join us on an eye-opening journey as Nathan Burris and I, attend the Jehovah’s Witnesses Memorial of Jesus’ Death at the Kingdom Hall near Sophia Baptist Church in Sophia, NC. In this video, we share our experience and the incredible opportunity we had to spread the true gospel of Christ after the service. Don’t miss [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Note: I am fully aware that I used different pronunciations for σῳζομένοις a few times. I&#8217;m a Southerner. I barely speak English well. You should hear me speaking French 🙂 As with last week, I am going to spend the next couple of weeks addressing some attacks by King James Version Onlyists who have decided [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Note: I am fully aware that I used different pronunciations for σῳζομένοις a few times. I&#8217;m a Southerner. I barely speak English well. You should hear me speaking French 🙂 As with last week, I am going to spend the next couple of weeks addressing some attacks by King James Version Onlyists who have decided [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Two Sundays ago, I preached on the Importance of a Pro-Life Ethic as part of my Why Theology Matters series that I have been doing at Sophia since the start of 2025. No sooner did I preach this message that someone sent me Andrew Sluder’s message on Predestination from March 6 of this year. I’ll [&hellip;]</p>

<p>In this fourth part of my “What is Calvinism” series, I want to address the doctrine of Limited Atonement or Particular Redemption. Some of you have asked why I didn’t begin with Total Depravity and then work my way through the TULIP acrostic. The short answer is, because I wanted to. I’m on only kidding. [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Penal Substitutionary Atonement Defended As a Key to Understanding Calvinism and Limited Atonement &#8211; What is Calvinism Series In this third video in my series on Calvinism, I will discuss and defend the death of Christ as a penal substitutionary atonement. The premise is simple. The death of Christ is an atonement. The death of [&hellip;]</p>

<p>I had the opportunity to teach debate to an ethics class made up of seniors at a local Christian school today. As part of the class, Nathan Burris and I had a condensed (50-minutes) moderated debate on “The sons of God in Genesis are angelic beings”. Nathan took the affirmative and I argued the negative. [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Today I want to cover the importance of understanding different atonement theories and especially Penal Substitutionary Atonement as a prerequisite for comprehending the Calvinist&#8217;s understanding of Limited Atonement. In the last video in my Calvinism series, I said that most of the disagreement towards the Limited Atonement doctrine of Calvinism is rooted in differing views [&hellip;]</p>

<p>There are two issues that really seem to boil the blood of some believers today. They are both the proverbial third-rails of theological discussions. One is King James Version Onlyism. I am certainly no stranger to that debate. The other one has to be Calvinism. While I abandoned King James Onlyism relatively recently in my [&hellip;]</p>

<p>In this video, Nathan and I take a look at the Fruit of the Spirit in Galatians 5:22-23 and choose individuals in scripture that best represent each attribute. Let us know in the comments if you like this discussion. If you wish, click the link below and let us know who you would have chosen [&hellip;]</p>

<p>In my last video, I began by saying that hyper dispensationalism is a false teaching that simply will not die. For a group who focuses heavily on 2 Timothy 2:15 and rightly dividing the word of truth, they just cannot do it. Rather, they have botched the text in such a way so as to [&hellip;]</p>

<p>This is a false teaching that simply will not die. This seems, by and large, to be a product of Dispensationalism. Now, this is absolutely not the teaching of all Dispensationalists and I wish to be very clear in stating that those who hold to the idea that Jesus preached a different gospel than Paul, [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Can you only learn Bible doctrine from a King James Bible? Roy Bell says so. Today, I want to look at another Roy Bell video. I have addressed him on a couple occasions. Some of you have asked me why I would waste my time on someone like Roy Bell. The guy has more than [&hellip;]</p>