FOR THE MASTER

2 Peter 3:9 (KJV) 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. If we look at this verse outside of its context, then it may easily be used to teach either Universalism, Provisionism, or Arminianism. But, once this verse is considered in its immediate context, the meaning becomes abundantly clear without needing to go outside of the conte

Responding to Boykin's article titled, "When Faith Hijacks Politics: Are We Losing the Republic We Were Meant to Be?".

On Michael Heiser’s Unseen Realm and Divine Council theory.

Dishonest Dan McClellan is up to his dastardly deeds again in his latest video titled, "Where did Cain’s wife come from?" In this video, Dan rejects the idea that Adam and Eve had other children that are not mentioned in the text and some of them must have been daughters and Cain married one of his sisters.

Is Baptism required for salvation? Was it ever required for salvation? Did Jews have to be baptized in order to be saved?

<p>Have you ever compared Jeremiah 31:32 and Hebrews 8:9? You should. You should also know how to deal with these two verses. It’s not a minor thing. In fact, I have heard pastors and teachers say that this issue is often too controversial to even bring up to their people for fear that people cannot [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Last week, I posted this graphic and asked a simple question: “Is there a KJVO who will defend this graphic by Jack McElroy using Biblical Hebrew and in light of the other creatures that are described in Job? It is arguments like this graphic that helped me see that KJVO is an emperor that has [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Since the start of the Israel-Iran conflict that began on June 13 as Israel launched a preemptive strike on dozens of sites in Iran including nuclear facilities, a heavy water nuclear reactor, top Iranian nuclear scientists, and top brass in the IRGC or Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; there has been nonstop discussion about the modern [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Today, I want to talk about dealing with negative criticism, slander, and personal attacks as a believer. This is not an issue that is limited to people in ministry or controversial pot-stirring pastors on YouTube and social media. Many of us deal with attacks from outside and even inside our own camps. Let&#8217;s talk about [&hellip;]</p>

<p>There is a Massive Inconsistency Problem among KJV Only Independent Fundamental Baptists (IFB). The IFB often prides itself on being separatists. They are separatists to the point that nothing is adiaphora. There don&#8217;t seem to be any secondary issues. There are no doctrines or issues where there isn&#8217;t a hard line of separation. In the [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Dan McClellan &nbsp;@maklelan&nbsp; says, &#8220;The Bible has been changed and that&#8217;s just not up for serious debate.&#8221; This claim is patently false. In this video, Dan McClellan is going to empty red Herrings, appeal to authority, and false dilemma as he speaks of technicalities and misrepresents or conflates facts. That’s a strong accusation on my [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Join us on an eye-opening journey as Nathan Burris and I, attend the Jehovah’s Witnesses Memorial of Jesus’ Death at the Kingdom Hall near Sophia Baptist Church in Sophia, NC. In this video, we share our experience and the incredible opportunity we had to spread the true gospel of Christ after the service. Don’t miss [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Note: I am fully aware that I used different pronunciations for σῳζομένοις a few times. I&#8217;m a Southerner. I barely speak English well. You should hear me speaking French 🙂 As with last week, I am going to spend the next couple of weeks addressing some attacks by King James Version Onlyists who have decided [&hellip;]</p>

<p>1 John 2:2 (LSB): and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world. An Arminian brother and friend made the statement on X back before Christmas that 1 John 2:2 is the single verse that destroys Limited Atonement single-handedly. I argue that [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Note: I am fully aware that I used different pronunciations for σῳζομένοις a few times. I&#8217;m a Southerner. I barely speak English well. You should hear me speaking French 🙂 As with last week, I am going to spend the next couple of weeks addressing some attacks by King James Version Onlyists who have decided [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Two Sundays ago, I preached on the Importance of a Pro-Life Ethic as part of my Why Theology Matters series that I have been doing at Sophia since the start of 2025. No sooner did I preach this message that someone sent me Andrew Sluder’s message on Predestination from March 6 of this year. I’ll [&hellip;]</p>

<p>A friend on X asked me to help explain the Greek of John 1:1. The Greek for John 1:1 is “Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος, καὶ ὁ Λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν Θεόν, καὶ Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος.” I will do my best to address this with the assumption that the majority of readers will not [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Have you ever heard of the &#8220;את Cepher&#8221;? If not, then let me be the first to introduce you to what I consider a massive mess masquerading as a Bible &#8212; even though the publishers nonsensically don&#8217;t call it a Bible. I&#8217;ll tell you why a little later. Before we get started, I want to [&hellip;]</p>

<p>Anti-Calvinists typically argue that &#8220;in him&#8221; in Ephesians 1:4 means that election is conditionally based on foreseen faith in Christ. This is what the poster in the image below was asserting. However, this is not the Calvinism killer that some would want to believe. Quite the contrary. The &#8220;in him&#8221; in no way invalidates the [&hellip;]</p>

<p>There are roughly 3,036 textual differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the Gospels:Matthew: 656Mark: 597Luke: 791John: 1022 70-80% of these differences are due to the presence or absence of the movable nu. The movable nu is a grammatical feature in Greek where the letter ν is added to the end of certain words (e.g., verbs [&hellip;]</p>